Re: openssl-users Digest, Vol 43, Issue 16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



No.

NATAWUT SUKRAT @jack

ในวันที่ พ. 13 มิ.ย. 2018 12:51 <openssl-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> เขียนว่า:
Send openssl-users mailing list submissions to
        openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        openssl-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
        openssl-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of openssl-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. OpenSSL Security Advisory (OpenSSL)
   2. Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0: How to get X509_STORE from X509_LOOKUP?
      (Matt Caswell)
   3. Re: 2 openssl installed? (Jan Just Keijser)
   4. Re: Advantech openssl compatibility issue (Brian.Chou)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:18:03 +0000
From: OpenSSL <openssl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: openssl-project@xxxxxxxxxxx, OpenSSL User Support ML
        <openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>, OpenSSL Announce ML
        <openssl-announce@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: OpenSSL Security Advisory
Message-ID: <20180612101803.GA31999@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512


OpenSSL Security Advisory [12 June 2018]
========================================

Client DoS due to large DH parameter (CVE-2018-0732)
====================================================

Severity: Low

During key agreement in a TLS handshake using a DH(E) based ciphersuite a
malicious server can send a very large prime value to the client. This will
cause the client to spend an unreasonably long period of time generating a key
for this prime resulting in a hang until the client has finished. This could be
exploited in a Denial Of Service attack.

Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing a new release of
OpenSSL 1.1.0 or 1.0.2 at this time. The fix will be included in OpenSSL 1.1.0i
and OpenSSL 1.0.2p when they become available. The fix is also available in
commit ea7abeeab (for 1.1.0) and commit 3984ef0b7 (for 1.0.2) in the OpenSSL git
repository.

This issue was reported to OpenSSL on 5th June 2018 by Guido Vranken who also
developed the fix.

References
==========

URL for this Security Advisory:
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20180612.txt

Note: the online version of the advisory may be updated with additional details
over time.

For details of OpenSSL severity classifications please see:
https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEhlersmDwVrHlGQg52cTSbQ5gRJEFAlsfnTgACgkQ2cTSbQ5g
RJE9Twf/VSgXaFPlW+JyA2BAiwGREMr/oMQe8mhmka3WQgNb7oMQRxk4ZqwRvLi2
ggPVOQilJ+tkXgeifEQ3SDRxDnnmcUvxbWB8Lt+7tjhM6O+GYGbGbzupnkBs2IIY
72vll4l7ySMQ8/fcdU/uuNyObfigLC9XndH3tEewxffs6uvDxMyGhZmNQpq1aZNj
rGj3dETUuO/Ln8siAD7nkv9xodRINViMP76fSKAtdaikvZa3uhLBMhX5tOzpR/ta
tc2+6uthdU9JjSRZZpfDlzzhsOFqMrLfOLrJQIIXshxUNeOZyJCkmT9ED8XZRDMB
twb1kOxCKz8Ky+Xm/Rki9uRVoZFjBg==
=kKic
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:32:21 +0100
From: Matt Caswell <matt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0: How to get X509_STORE from
        X509_LOOKUP?
Message-ID: <3766b295-2914-b3a1-a259-0d9a81a2548f@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8



On 12/06/18 10:58, Stephan M?hlstrasser wrote:
> In OpenSSL 1.0.2 this was no problem as the "X509_STORE *store_ctx"
> member of the X509_LOOKUP structure was directly accessible. But in
> OpenSSL 1.1.0 the X509_LOOKUP structure is opaque, and as far as I can
> see there is no API function available that would retrieve the
> X509_STORE pointer from a X509_LOOKUP pointer.
>
> Is this intentional, or was this an omission when making the X509_LOOKUP
> structure opaque in OpenSSL 1.1.0?

It was an omission that is fixed in the latest dev version of OpenSSL
1.1.0. See this commit:

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/6912debb881e669f7a7fb621588e20347111c4f0

This will be in 1.1.0i when it gets released (no released date as yet).

Matt



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 18:30:08 +0200
From: Jan Just Keijser <janjust@xxxxxxxxx>
To: openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx, Sampei <sampei02@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2 openssl installed?
Message-ID: <a983eb13-92a8-f054-dfac-0c881ad8d64d@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

Hi,

On 07/06/18 06:14, Sampei wrote:
>
> t?s a server installed many many years ago and there are applications
> which are no used.
> Server is too late and I have new server (latest Centos 6) for
> migrating where I installed latest version.
> I?d like to take to new server all certificate database (certificated
> included) which I created.
> Openssl is only tool to create test certificates.
> I don?t know if there are apps which are using the e configs, but I
> think no.
>
this has little to do with OpenSSL itself and more with PKI management.
Basically, your problem seems to be that you have an older server and
you don't know where the certificates and private keys (i.e. the PKI)
were stored. What you need to do, is find out where the certifcates are
held, together with the index.txt file. In order to do so, you could use
something like
 ? find / -name '*.pem'
or
 ? find / -name index.txt
and check all directories where such files are found. This will be a
lengthy process, as the find command has to traverse the entire filesystem.

good luck,

JJK



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 05:40:01 +0000
From: Brian.Chou <Brian.Chou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx" <openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Brian.Ng" <brian.ng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Mojo.Huang"
        <Mojo.Huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Advantech openssl compatibility issue
Message-ID: <ea8de7a39ca24fd9bb6db14301d15d19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Subscribe and send again.

From: Brian.Chou
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 1:21 PM
To: 'openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx'
Cc: Brian.Ng; Mojo.Huang
Subject: Advantech openssl compatibility issue

Dear support team

  We met openssl crash issue on our Intel Atom C3000 SoC platform.
Openssl crashes when run "s_client -connect IP:Port" command.
In win10 event viewer it show "Faulting module name:LIBEAY32.dll, version:1.0.2.8......". (Figure 1)
The issue only happened to "1.0.2h" or older version. (Table 1)
And other CPU/Chipset on our side can work normally with same command.
Can you help to explain what changes are made between "1.0.2h" and "1.0.2i" that may cause this issue?
Please let me know if you need more info, thank you.

Note: We found similar issue by google, not sure if it's related. (https://forum.filezilla-project.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=32837&sid=14d3d99cb60f1a6867d16aba89403015<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.filezilla-2Dproject.org_viewtopic.php-3Ff-3D6-26t-3D32837-26sid-3D14d3d99cb60f1a6867d16aba89403015&d=DwMFAg&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=lgpGrPZI_ai301hZxt6u5Jb3XQrxd6ed5-1gL-SJmDE&s=cNoUfknWBgsh-JRnghh6TVNsW72g89P7uuSrJLnLn8g&e=>)

Table 1.Test under Winsvr 2016/Win10
Openssl version

Connect by "s_client -connect IP:Port"

1.0.2g

Fail

1.0.2h

Fail

1.0.2i

Pass

1.0.2o

Pass

1.0.0d

Pass



Figure 1
[cid:image002.jpg@01D40273.2D91C710]
Best regards,
Brian Chou
Application Engineering of Industrial IoT Group
Advantech Co., Ltd.
Tel: 886-2-2792-7818 ext,1431
e-mail:Brian.Chou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:brian.chou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



Best regards,
Brian Chou
Application Engineering of Industrial IoT Group
Advantech Co., Ltd.
Tel: 886-2-2792-7818 ext,1431
e-mail:Brian.Chou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:brian.chou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20180613/0053e43a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 30883 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20180613/0053e43a/attachment.jpg>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
openssl-users mailing list
openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users


------------------------------

End of openssl-users Digest, Vol 43, Issue 16
*********************************************
-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux