Re: Call for testing TLS 1.3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>    The issue is most likely that no one "in the wild" has done any testing 
    of significance.

I thought the Akamai numbers were significant.
    
    I can certainly see tls1.2 exchange but there is nothing for tls1.3 and
    so I am working on getting a site up pronto ( in the wild ) to test.

I am sorry if it wasn't clear, but I was referring to *Akamai* not *OpenSSL.*  Let me repost the whole message edited a bit.

AKAMAI has partially deployed TLS 1.3 on one of its networks using its own server. Customer can opt-in to beta-test.  AKAMAI has already seen hundreds of millions of connections, with [xxx, elided] megabytes of data exchanged.   AKAMAI has found no issues.  AKAMAI does not do 0RTT. This is production traffic, not staging or test. AKAMAI has received no customer complaints.

I was surprised by how many connections and how much data AKAMAI is already seeing.  I think that makes a very strong argument that TLS 1.3 should be enabled by default if it all possible.



-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux