> On Mar 25, 2018, at 7:46 AM, Jeremy Harris <jgh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Not sure what format DKIM wants the key in, but if it is SKPI
>> in base64 form
>
> It is not. The _raw_ pubkey, base64'd is what is wanted.
> No ASN.1 wrapping; that's why I said "raw".
I'm afraid you're wrong about that:
$ dig +noall +ans +nocl +nottl +nosplit -t txt 20161025._domainkey.gmail.com
20161025._domainkey.gmail.com. TXT "k=rsa; p=MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAviPGBk4ZB64UfSqWyAicdR7lodhytae+EYRQVtKDhM+1mXjEqRtP/pDT3sBhazkmA48n2k5NJUyMEoO8nc2r6sUA+/Dom5jRBZp6qDKJOwjJ5R/OpHamlRG+YRJQqR" "tqEgSiJWG7h7efGYWmh4URhFM9k9+rmG/CwCgwx7Et+c8OMlngaLl04/bPmfpjdEyLWyNimk761CX6KymzYiRDNz1MOJOJ7OzFaS4PFbVLn0m5mf0HVNtBpPwWuCNvaFVflUYxEyblbB6h/oWOPGbzoSgtRA47SHV53SwZjIsVpbq4LxUW9IxAEwYzGcSgZ4n5Q8X8TndowsDUzoccPFGhdwIDAQAB"
$ printf "MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAviPGBk4ZB64UfSqWyAicdR7lodhytae+EYRQVtKDhM+1mXjEqRtP/pDT3sBhazkmA48n2k5NJUyMEoO8nc2r6sUA+/Dom5jRBZp6qDKJOwjJ5R/OpHamlRG+YRJQqRtqEgSiJWG7h7efGYWmh4URhFM9k9+rmG/CwCgwx7Et+c8OMlngaLl04/bPmfpjdEyLWyNimk761CX6KymzYiRDNz1MOJOJ7OzFaS4PFbVLn0m5mf0HVNtBpPwWuCNvaFVflUYxEyblbB6h/oWOPGbzoSgtRA47SHV53SwZjIsVpbq4LxUW9IxAEwYzGcSgZ4n5Q8X8TndowsDUzoccPFGhdwIDAQAB" | openssl base64 -A -d | openssl asn1parse -inform DER
0:d=0 hl=4 l= 290 cons: SEQUENCE
4:d=1 hl=2 l= 13 cons: SEQUENCE
6:d=2 hl=2 l= 9 prim: OBJECT :rsaEncryption
17:d=2 hl=2 l= 0 prim: NULL
19:d=1 hl=4 l= 271 prim: BIT STRING
That's an ASN1 encoding of X.509 SPKI object. Which is
not surprising, even for RSA one must still encode the
modulus and exponent somehow, and other algorithms might
have parameters... So ASN.1 it is.
--
Viktor.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
