BTW, which OpenSSL version are we talking about here? In message <a3437978-3a36-41b4-20e8-0210ef4a592b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:59:20 +0100, "etc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <etc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: etc> Yes... thats the same what I thought. etc> etc> I expected to link against the the vanilla built if I set no-shared. etc> But it links against my systems libs. etc> etc> It seems config takes my no-shared correctly - because If I do a typo etc> it will tell me about an unknown option. etc> etc> Only If I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to my vanillas path then it links etc> against the just built libs. etc> etc> Are there more parameters than no-shared that influence that?? etc> etc> Thanks! etc> Chris etc> etc> On 2018-03-14 10:54, Richard Levitte wrote: etc> > Something here makes no sense at all... you configure with etc> > 'no-shared', and then get an apps/openssl that's linked with the etc> > system shared libraries? etc> > etc> > In message <323c64fe-c3a7-0b93-a11e-46f743b999be@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on etc> > Tue, 13 Mar 2018 23:46:14 +0100, "etc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" etc> > <etc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: etc> > etc> > etc> Hi! etc> > etc> etc> > etc> I put a vanilla OpenSSL in a local folder and compiled it. etc> > etc> etc> > etc> ./config no-shared etc> > etc> make etc> > etc> etc> > etc> I will not do a "make install" because I will keep my distros etc> > etc> installation. etc> > etc> But Iwill use the vanilla for tests. So I need the binary as well etc> > as etc> > etc> the libs. etc> > etc> etc> > etc> After a ldd I see that the apps/openssl as well as the libssl etc> > and etc> > etc> libcrypto use the systems OpenSSL-libs instead of the one I just etc> > etc> compiled. etc> > etc> etc> > etc> Is there an option so the makefile will produce binaries out of etc> > its etc> > etc> own libs instead of the sytems? etc> > etc> etc> > etc> Thanks! etc> > etc> etc> > etc> etc> > etc> etc> > etc> etc> etc> -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
