Re: 1.1.1 pre1 tests failing on Solaris SPARC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>-- Original Message --
>
>>>>> As for -lm, which symbol was undefined?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Undefined                       first referenced
>>>>   symbol                             in file
>>>> fabs                                test/ct_test.o
>>>
>>> ??? One can only wonder where does it come from. I see no fabs
>>> anywhere...
>
>Ah! Missed it! There is fabs call in ct_test. I was looking for
>reference in binary code. On multiple platforms including Solaris x86.
>Question is how come it isn't a problem anywhere else. It looks like
>it's customarily inlined, but not here. Well, you insist on
>-xbuiltin=%none, so I suppose this has to be it. In such case it's on you...

Most compilers (including gcc) inlines fabs()
Solaris cc does not when using -O0 -g which I use when debugging.
If I remember correctly, solaris cc also inlines when using higher level of optimization
but I may remember wrong.

-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux