On 11/29/2017 6:13 PM, Salz, Rich via
openssl-users wrote:
Agreed, that's a tough trade-off. Still, I'd rather have compatibility problems - as long as there's a way to explicitly request the less-secure option - than silently be insecure. Having per-user or system-wide configuration files that are consulted under the covers would help, since then the user could revert to less-secure settings without needing the application source. Maybe have the "create handle" function take an application name as an argument, so that individual applications could be managed separately. Looking at it another way: browsers manage to do it... -- Jordan Brown, Oracle Solaris |
-- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users