Re: Why wasn't the fix for IP name restrictions included in 1.0.2 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx" <openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Why wasn't the fix for IP name restrictions included in 1.0.2 ?
From: "Salz, Rich via openssl-users" <openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 21:06:12 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
In-reply-to: <07e0f196-bbe2-e138-ca89-6f13f7bede49@wisemo.com>
References: <07e0f196-bbe2-e138-ca89-6f13f7bede49@wisemo.com>
Reply-to: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx>, openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1b.0.161010

➢     However for some unknown reason, this was not included in 1.0.2
    which thus still rejects all such certificate chains.
    
Because it was seen to be a feature, not a bug-fix?

-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why wasn't the fix for IP name restrictions included in 1.0.2 ?
  - From: Jakob Bohm

References:
- Why wasn't the fix for IP name restrictions included in 1.0.2 ?
  - From: Jakob Bohm

Prev by Date: Why wasn't the fix for IP name restrictions included in 1.0.2 ?
Next by Date: Re: Why wasn't the fix for IP name restrictions included in 1.0.2 ?
Previous by thread: Why wasn't the fix for IP name restrictions included in 1.0.2 ?
Next by thread: Re: Why wasn't the fix for IP name restrictions included in 1.0.2 ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux