Re: Does openssl pick low level interface or high level interface to do encrypt?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



What OpenSSL does is not necessarily obvious.  The INSTALL document talks about the no-asm configuration option.  Details about what the assembler code does in terms of optimization are only available by reading the source code comments in the various Perl files that generate the assembler, mostly.

 

On x86, the assembly code uses the CPUID instruction (see the OPENSSL_ia32cap.pod manpage) to determine if various instructions (AES, SSE, MMX, etc) are available and will use them if so.  For other processors, similar tests are performed if at all possible.

 

I have added this to the FAQ

 

-- 

Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies

Member, OpenSSL Dev Team

IM: richsalz@xxxxxxxxx Twitter: RichSalz

 

From: - JinsongJi [mailto:jjsbear@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2017 9:09 AM
To: openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Does openssl pick low level interface or high level interface to do encrypt?

 

Hi,

 

For one simple operation: openssl enc -aes-256-cbc -salt -in foo.txt -out foo.enc

Does openssl pick classic implementation or AES-NI implementation to do this encrypt?

 

Does any user/application always pick classic implementation for AES operation regardless of AES-NI improves speed much?

 

Is there any document about this interface selection?

 

Thanks,

Jinsong

-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux