On 28/07/17 21:15, Ken Goldman wrote: > On 7/28/2017 4:05 PM, Salz, Rich via openssl-users wrote: >>> The __current__ code for this function returns values if the **BIGNUM is >>> not NULL. Thus, it appears safe to pass in NULL for values not needed. >> >>> >>> If this behavior is guaranteed, it would be nice if it was documented. >> >> Wanna open an issue to fix the doc? :) >> > > I'd be happy to, but I don't know how. Click "New Issue" on this page: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues You'll need a github user id. > > I'd also be willing to help with documentation, if that's possible. It is possible. Make the relevant changes (file doc/man3/RSA_get0_key.pod) in a recent checkout of master and then create a github pull request: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pulls Matt -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
