Difference between libssl.a in static openssl build versus libssl.a in dynamic openssl build ???

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Everyone,

1.
I am trying to upgrade some libraries of an older version of openssl (~0.9.7) with the libraries of a less old version of openssl (1.0.0e).


2.
When I perform a dynamic openssl build with the following commands, I get (among other files) a libssl.a file.

cd /joe/openssl-1.0.1e/dynamic/64bit/openssl-1.0.1e
make clean
setarch x86_64 ./config -m64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC shared no-zlib
make



3.
When I perform a static openssl build with the following commands, I get (among other files) another libssl.a file.

cd /joe/openssl-1.0.1e/static/64bit/openssl-1.0.1e
./config -D_GNU_SOURCE
make clean
make



4.
I am trying to determine which one of these two newer libssl.a files I should use to replace the older ~0.9.7 libssl.a file.


Any ideas how to do this?

I have been trying to use the "readelf " and "file" commands on these 3 different libssl.a files, but I am not seeing a pattern in the files which allows me to determine which one should be used.

5.
I am compiling on a SLES11 SP1 64-bit machine.


Thanks!!!

Joe
----------------

-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux