Re: Rejecting SHA-1 certificates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Viktor Dukhovni <openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Jul 10, 2017, at 1:12 PM, Niklas Keller <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It's very well worth the effort, otherwise there's a security issue, because certificates can be forged.

Collision attacks don't directly lead to certificate forgery.  There are
no known 2nd-preimage attacks on SHA-1.

I'm pretty sure, but are you saying you would rather wait for a demonstration of the weakness being turned into a practical attack?

Second pre-image attacks against reduced SHA-1 have been demonstrated. It's only a matter of time before second pre-image resistance for full SHA-1 is dead and buried.

--
"Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no wiser, but an intelligent person requires only two thousand five hundred."

- The Mahābhārata
-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux