Building libssl and libcrypto, .dlls and .libs, with different names?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Good day,

 

Has anyone on this mailing list gone through the steps necessary to build OpenSSL 1.1.0f with the old filenames (libeay and ssleay)?

 

Our current build is based on libeay32 and ssleay32 as the 32-bit filenames and libeay64 and ssleay64 as the 64-bit filenames. Accomplishing the “64” name change requires just a simple edit on the 2 .def files after ms\do_win64a and before nmake.

 

But the build process for 1.1.0 is different (no ms\do_win64a step) and I’m hoping someone on this list has already gone through the effort for something similar and will share so that I don’t have to start digging through makefiles to reinvent the same wheel.

 

Thanks in advance,

M Zarlenga

 

 


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is the property of International Game Technology PLC and/or its subsidiaries and may contain proprietary, confidential or trade secret information. This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient and have received this message in error, please delete this message from your system. Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.


-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux