Re: OpenSSL and RPATH's

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On May 31, 2017, at 6:16 AM, Wouter Verhelst <wouter.verhelst@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> RPATH is useful if the SONAME is the same but the libraries aren't, for
> whatever reason (e.g., local patches). Other than that, you don't need
> it, and it's generally a bad idea.

There's no need to take absolutist view on this subject.  RPATHs are a tool
that some will find useful, and others will prefer to avoid.

-- 
-- 
	Viktor.

-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux