Thanks Viktor for your feedback Well, the 2 certificates are embedded in the python code as PEM; I am attaching them again here as plain files if that helps
Attachment:
p1
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
p2
Description: Binary data
In terms of versioning, on one box that exhibits the issue of returning -1, I have this: # cat /etc/fedora-release Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) both openssl and m2crypto installed from fedora’s stock repos: # rpm -q m2crypto openssl-libs m2crypto-0.23.0-2.fc24.x86_64 openssl-libs-1.0.2j-3.fc24.x86_64 # uname -a Linux r2labsfa.pl.sophia.inria.fr 4.8.15-300.fc25.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Dec 15 23:10:23 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I hope it clarifies — thanks for looking into this — Thierry > On 13 Jan 2017, at 15:26, Viktor Dukhovni <openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> On Jan 13, 2017, at 5:28 AM, Thierry Parmentelat <thierry.parmentelat@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I have two certificates, one being signed by the other >> the attached code is a python code that uses M2Crypto to check for that fact > > Your current problem is failure to post the two certificates along with > the anecdotal description. You're also not reporting which versions of > the various O/S distributions you were using, and more importantly which > versions of OpenSSL were linked into Python's M2Crypto. > > Real answers require real data. > > -- > -- > Viktor. > > -- > openssl-users mailing list > To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
-- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
