On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz at akamai.com> wrote: > > > It's not a huge step to support full blown ISO 8601 (which has a few more > > alternatives to specify time intervals *). I like the idea. > > No, it *is* a huge step. There's a reason why W3C XML schema language > (XSD), not known for being lightweight, profiled the ISO standard. > > Support RFC3339[1] is relative easy. [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3339 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20160907/ac7f80f8/attachment.html>
