More secure use of DSA?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: More secure use of DSA?
From: rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx (Salz, Rich)
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:09:25 +0000
In-reply-to: <36d17ed2-2a55-de03-8f21-e97885198b1b@gmail.com>
References: <6ada9694-ea0e-08ea-8936-1256487288a9@gmail.com> <b1e5cb1942314397909db3148a3b4cce@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <36d17ed2-2a55-de03-8f21-e97885198b1b@gmail.com>

> I thought DSA was more secure than RSA? Granted, "I thought" is a newbie
> understanding.

This is completely wrong.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- More secure use of DSA?
  - From: Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- More secure use of DSA?
  - From: Leam Hall

References:
- More secure use of DSA?
  - From: Leam Hall
- More secure use of DSA?
  - From: Salz, Rich
- More secure use of DSA?
  - From: Leam Hall

Prev by Date: More secure use of DSA?
Next by Date: More secure use of DSA?
Previous by thread: More secure use of DSA?
Next by thread: More secure use of DSA?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux