I?m interested in the rest of this story. Does compiling a separate library for linking work for you now? Our product runs on two platforms: one Pentium-based and one Mips-based. The Pentium build works fine but the Mips build fails at link time with unresolved function references. From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ajay Garg Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 10:16 PM To: openssl-users at openssl.org Subject: Re: Where to find definitions of certain functions Aahhhhh... I guess I was being an idiot. I just realize that the recommended/best/easier way is to compile openssl as a separate library (enabling/disabling/removing features as required), and then link this library to our application-binary. Thanks a ton Salz, you have saved me a LOT of hours :) Thanks and Regards, Ajay On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Salz, Rich <rsalz at akamai.com<mailto:rsalz at akamai.com>> wrote: > Also, I am not using Makefiles, rather compiling each "c unit" using gcc using first-principles. > Could that be an issue? Probably. Only "make" is supported. You are on your own. -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users -- Regards, Ajay <table class="TM_EMAIL_NOTICE"><tr><td><pre> TREND MICRO EMAIL NOTICE The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and delete the original message from your mail system. </pre></td></tr></table> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20161017/6ce56a15/attachment-0001.html>
