openssl shared libs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Look at Intel SGX, available since Skylake CPU.

Sent?from?my?BlackBerry?10?smartphone?on?the Verizon?Wireless?4G?LTE?network.
? Original Message ?
From: Salz, Rich
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 08:17
To: openssl-users at openssl.org
Reply To: openssl-users at openssl.org
Cc: Dominik Stra?er
Subject: Re: openssl shared libs


> Now my company is (T) and we don't want to leak (V)'s session key.
> You may assume that our binary is protected state of the art agains debugger attacks and stuff.
> So the only question is if the shared openssl library makes the tool more vulnerable?

You cannot prevent someone from changing what the software that runs on their computer. You can only make it harder. 
Shared libraries are easier for a user to replace; static libraries are harder.

-- 
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4350 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20160623/eea519b0/attachment.bin>


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux