On Thu, Jul 21, 2016, Jim Carroll wrote: > I've run into what appears to be a change to defaults between 0.9.8 and > 1.1.0, and I wanted to make sure it's not a bug we've introduced. > > While reviewing unittests, we see that calls to X509_REQ_new() generate an > X509 object with the version set to -1. When we write this object to a PEM > file and read it back, the version is set then set to 0. Is this expected > (GIGO) behavior? > Can you give a few more details about how you are doing this? Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org
