I'm not currently interested in the given platforms, and while I really hope to never be interested again, I can't rule it out. It'd be nice to be able to follow the discussions, without necessarily contributing. But I also understand I if those involved don't want to include those in my position, since I can just read your updates, and accept them without knowing all the reasons behind it. :) I'm ok either way. TOM -- Preserve wildlife -- pickle a squirrel! > On Jun 22, 2015, at 11:27 AM, Steve Marquess <marquess at openssl.com> wrote: > > If you don't know or care about FIPS 140-2 then count yourself very > lucky and move on. > > In the same spirit of collaboration that underlies all of the open > source based OpenSSL FIPS Object Module validations, of which the #1747 > validation is the latest, some of the stakeholders impacted by the > recent "hostage" issue[*] are discussing possible responses among > themselves. I have been told they would like to reach out to other > "interested impacted customers". We know who some of these are, but > there will be many more users of the #1747 validation on those platforms > we don't know about. > > If you are a such a stakeholder and would like to participate in those > discussions please let me know (contact info below) and I'll make the > appropriate introductions. > > -Steve M. > > [*] see http://openssl.com/fips/aftermath.html > > -- > Steve Marquess > OpenSSL Software Foundation, Inc. > 1829 Mount Ephraim Road > Adamstown, MD 21710 > USA > +1 877 673 6775 s/b > +1 301 874 2571 direct > marquess at opensslfoundation.com > marquess at openssl.com > gpg/pgp key: http://openssl.com/docs/0x6D1892F5.asc > _______________________________________________ > openssl-users mailing list > To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users >
