> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-bounces at openssl.org] On Behalf > Of Kaduk, Ben > Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 17:06 > > On 7/21/15, 17:37, "Ken Goldman" <kgoldman at us.ibm.com> wrote: > >On 7/21/2015 6:20 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > >> > >> For the stragglers, I don't think its a stretch to ask C99 in 2015. If only. > >Visual Studio is often used on Windows, and it is not C99. > > It is getting closer, though: > http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2013/06/28/c-11-14-stl-features- > fixe > s-and-breaking-changes-in-vs-2013.aspx discusses the addition of several > useful C99 features in VS2013, including compound literals, designated > initializers, and variable declarations. Still no sign of a conforming snprintf, though. MSVC isn't even really a conforming hosted-environment C90. It's debatable whether it can be called C at all. -- Michael Wojcik Technology Specialist, Micro Focus
