Has the support for SPARC architecture crypto extensions been Implemented?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Some additional information here. When testing the default openssl installed
in /usr/bin/ on Solaris 11, I saw a much better result below. Hence I
believe OpenSSL utility 'openssl' built by me does not use the hardware
crypto accelerators at all. 

Anyone knows the reason?

Thanks,
Aaron 

ksol1% /usr/bin/openssl speed -evp aes-128-cbc
Doing aes-128-cbc for 3s on 16 size blocks: 113798920 aes-128-cbc's in 2.99s
Doing aes-128-cbc for 3s on 64 size blocks: 48425338 aes-128-cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-128-cbc for 3s on 256 size blocks: 14613535 aes-128-cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-128-cbc for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 3768123 aes-128-cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-128-cbc for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 488001 aes-128-cbc's in 3.00s
OpenSSL 1.0.0k 5 Feb 2013
built on: date not available
options:bn(64,32) md2(int) rc4(ptr,int) des(ptr,risc1,16,int) aes(partial)
blowf
ish(ptr)
compiler: information not available
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192
bytes
aes-128-cbc     608957.43k  1033073.88k  1247021.65k  1286185.98k 
1332568.06k





--
View this message in context: http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/Has-the-support-for-SPARC-architecture-crypto-extensions-been-Implemented-tp58866p59162.html
Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux