Assembler Optimizations in 'crypto' on Windows

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear OpenSSL User,

I am working on porting 0.9.8h based 'OpenSSL customization' to 1.0.1.

Earlier this code was using 'cpp' as input parameter to the Perl scripts.

1. What option shall I use now for Windows?

As per documentation, nasm will be the only supported assembler. But
currently both masm (option win32) and nasm (option win32n) work.

2. Why nasm is prefered over masm? Maybe ml.exe is better since it comes
from ms.

Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20150114/34f5e4de/attachment-0001.html>


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux