The evolution of the 'master' branch
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Subject
: The evolution of the 'master' branch
From
: rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx (Salz, Rich)
Date
: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:16:06 +0000
In-reply-to
: <
54D4E5D3.6090808@wisemo.com
>
References
: <
20150203220231.GA12587@openssl.org
> <
54D23F42.3060203@wisemo.com
> <
453ad2042e6c43e5897f1689e230883f@ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com
> <
54D4E5D3.6090808@wisemo.com
>
Thanks for your detailed reply. Not sure what else I can say except that we disagree.
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
References
:
The evolution of the 'master' branch
From:
Rich Salz
The evolution of the 'master' branch
From:
Jakob Bohm
The evolution of the 'master' branch
From:
Salz, Rich
The evolution of the 'master' branch
From:
Jakob Bohm
Prev by Date:
The evolution of the 'master' branch
Next by Date:
How to load local certificate folder on windows
Previous by thread:
The evolution of the 'master' branch
Next by thread:
The evolution of the 'master' branch
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux ARM Kernel]
[Linux ARM]
[Linux Omap]
[Fedora ARM]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Linux]
[Linux OMAP]
[Linux MIPS]
[ECOS]
[Asterisk Internet PBX]
[Linux API]
