Hi Dan, On 10.12.2015 16:27, daniel bryan wrote: > *TEST #2: *Next test was using OCSP: > > [dan at canttouchthis PKI]$ openssl ocsp -CAfile CAS/cabundle.pem -VAfile > VAS/def_ocsp.pem -issuer CAS/IC\ ABC\ CA3\ DEV.cer -cert > CERTS/0x500c8bd-revoked.pem -url http://ocspresponder:8080 > > /Response verify OK > CERTS/0x500c8bd-revoked.pem: *unknown* > This Update: Dec 9 20:48:26 2015 GMT/ > > as you can see the client *was NOT *informed the certificate was revoked. and also that it is not good -> unknown, revoked and good are the 3 values ... > > We are using a 3rd party vendors OCSP service, and I am of the opinion > that an OCSP service should provide a revoked response regardless of > the time validity of the CRL. does the OCSP responder cert be the signing cert itself or was it signed by the same signing cert that signed the cert you want to validate? or specific to your sample: did CAS/IC\ ABC\ CA3\ DEV.cer sign both CERTS/0x500c8bd-revoked.pem and the OCSP responder cert (VAS/def_ocsp.pem)? > Walter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20151210/8e208921/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4312 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <http://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-users/attachments/20151210/8e208921/attachment.bin>
