On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:34:03AM -0800, Norm Green wrote: > Thanks for the workaround. After running your code I now see this: > > cast.h -> openssl-1.0.2e/../../crypto/cast/cast.h > openssl-1.0.2e -> . > > Which is still different than 1.0.2d: > > cast.h -> ../../crypto/cast/cast.h > > Are these new symlinks here to stay or were they included in the in error? > What will 1.0.2f look like in this regard? > > I need to merge 1.0.2e into a vendor branch in svn and I can foresee these > symlink changes causing me a lot of grief. The symlinks are not intentional, and it turns out that a test script and a "pod" documentation file are also missing. I expect an updated tarball is imminent. -- Viktor.
