On Mon, 3 Apr 2023, François Ouellet wrote: > > IIRC we toyed with recording something fake like "sftp" in ut_line > > but that caused problems as none of the other tools were set up to > > accept it. > > Is there an archive of the discussion of the problems it brings to the > other tools? I'd like to understand the issues. Discussion was probably on this list, though some of it might have been by direct email. > What other tools are impacted? If I don't need them, would it be > possible to think about adding an option to enter fake utmp entries for > interal-sftp sessions (or any other subsystem, I'm only seeing my own > little problem here)? Potentially anything that uses utmp is impacted. The difficulty of figuring out what software is in this set is part of the problem. > Could I find some code from those tests from some time ago and apply > it locally? Was there anything publicly available? A quick glance > at the code was not enough for me to see anything obvious that could > be done. No, I don't think anything was recorded. -d _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
