Damien Miller wrote: > Philippe Cerfon wrote: > > Are you going to merge the patch of yours? > > Does it solve your problem? Was there an actual problem? As I understood it there was no problem but just the question of why SIGQUIT was different. I think SIGQUIT should not be passed on because SIGQUIT is different in that the purpose of it is for debugging to dump a core image and it does not make sense to pass it along. Adding passing it along would actually create a bug in that then if used it would cause multiple processes to dump a core image, all named "core" on traditional platforms, and the last one dumped would be the one there rather than the one targeted with the SIGQUIT. Bob _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
