Haven't checked that yet but I'll look into it tomorrow. On Tue, Mar 8, 2022, 18:13 Darren Tucker <dtucker@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 09:59, rapier <rapier@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > I was poking at the MAC routines looking for some efficiencies for high > > performance environments. I was looking at the umac.c and comparing it > > to the original source at https://fastcrypto.org/front/umac/umac.c After > > a couple of false starts I found that reverting the endian conversion > > routines back to what Krovetz wrote realized a 8% to 16% improvement > > Interesting! One obvious difference is what you have is potentially > inline-able static functions instead of function calls across > compilation units that (barring whole program optimization) can't be > inlined. If you put the existing functions from misc.c into umac.c as > statics do you see the same improvement? > > -- > Darren Tucker (dtucker at dtucker.net) > GPG key 11EAA6FA / A86E 3E07 5B19 5880 E860 37F4 9357 ECEF 11EA A6FA (new) > Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience > usually comes from bad judgement. > _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
