Re: Host names hashing

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

 



What are the cryptographic consequences of host name hah collision?

My point is - the only reason to consider replacing the algorithm here would be to avoid varying around another hash that is not usable cryptographically.  

Regards,
Uri

> On Jan 5, 2022, at 07:05, Dmitry Belyavskiy <dbelyavs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> OpenSSH uses SHA1 without any alternate options for hostname hashing (looks
> like this is the last place where an alternate option for SHA1 is not
> available). SHA1 HMAC is considered safe enough for now, but it may change
> so it's definitely worth migrating to more safe algorithms (SHA2?).
> 
> I'd like to discuss possible options of such migration.
> 
> Many thanks!
> -- 
> Dmitry Belyavskiy
> _______________________________________________
> openssh-unix-dev mailing list
> openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux