OK, Thanks, Ingo. -----Original Message----- From: Ingo Schwarze <schwarze@xxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, August 13, 2021 10:50 AM To: Scott Neugroschl <scott_n@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Damien Miller <djm@xxxxxxxxxxx>; openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Call for testing: OpenSSH 8.7 Hi Scott, Scott Neugroschl wrote on Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 05:03:02PM +0000: > Dumb question, where's the Bugzilla? https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.openssh.com%2freport.html&c=E,1,zs5uflNQFRcpmUJ8sNHTMxjn649Q4a2C4xiPth4b5VAIjhmTIyxipqh2NttuPx8g4tZpgh3BpNJfFVFHvaKZhYau-_k2hbnMVU1KOZNkTXoT&typo=1 says at https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fbugzilla.mindrot.org%2f&c=E,1,29tZJz_Xun6iIHv_SD6WhJWMl4KkV2HSZAluVB8cqIPdMBVGai2t8CepFJWiwZdUKRg3bdv-lcL-e37ACZ-bmvk4vyVjJROEKVNizPbKnRHORkmLEHoEv6HjwZs,&typo=1 but it also says that reporting bugs to <openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> is OK, which you already did. The README file in the tarball says as much. > It's been a while for me. There's a typo in the changelog: > > In the description of the configfile parser change, the text reads: > > "Previously some options (e.g. DenyUsers) *to* appear on a line with > no subsequent arguments." Oh, that is merely in the mail message, neither in the tarball nor anywhere on the web site. > (emphasis mine) > > The correct phrasing should be: > > "Previously some options (e.g. DenyUsers) *could* appear on a line > with no subsequent arguments." > > I'd file the bug, but I don't know where Bugzilla is. I doubt that's needed for a typo in an email. Yours, Ingo _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
