Re: Bringing back tcp wrappers

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

 



iptables is not an external app. It's never "down" any more than
/etc/hosts.deny is down. What can tcpwrappers do that iptables cannot do
even better?


Tom.III


On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 10:32 AM Saint Michael <venefax@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> any external app can be down at any time, while openssh remains active and
> exposed, BUT libwrap is baked into openssh, so the protection will hold.
> Libwrap is the last line of defense. Why remove it?
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 1:01 PM Lars Noodén <lars.nooden@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On 6/23/21 5:54 PM, Saint Michael wrote:
> > > I compiled the latest version, 8.1, inside Centos 7.9, and
> > [snip]
> >
> > What use-case would there be there for tcpwrappers that cannot be better
> > solved with a packet filter?  In the case of CentOS 7 you have nftables
> > and iptables.
> >
> > /Lars
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > openssh-unix-dev mailing list
> > openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> openssh-unix-dev mailing list
> openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
>
_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev




[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux