RE: [EXTERNAL] Bringing back tcp wrappers

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

 



I second this request.  We were forced to put tcpwrappers support in ourselves because customers complained about the removal…

From: openssh-unix-dev <openssh-unix-dev-bounces+herbie.robinson=stratus.com@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Saint Michael
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2021 10:55 AM
To: openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Bringing back tcp wrappers

[EXTERNAL SENDER: This email originated from outside of Stratus Technologies. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.]

I compiled the latest version, 8.1, inside Centos 7.9, and to my dismay,
there was no support for libwrap, which offers a level of protection that
is added to a firewall, but in my opinion, it works better. Also, I didn’t
find service definitions for Systemd. ¿where can I find them?

How do I overcome these obstacles? In the times when cyberattacks come on a
daily basis, we should keep libwrap baked into openssh, even as optional.



Thanks for your help.
_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev<https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev>
_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev




[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux