On Fri, 2 Apr 2021, Bob Proulx wrote: > > I keep it... it's useful to push to machines before they have rsync > > (e.g. to push updated sources.list, keys, etc). > > Rename it (on Debian dpkg-divert it) to scp.real? That would be fine. That would be an option. > > > a script wrapper that called rsync. "There! I deliverd an scp that > > > handles resume. Problem solved." > > > I've named mine rcp though. > > And the circle is now complete. That was the intention ;-) > Though I guess there is no danger of > it name colliding with the original real rcp anymore. On some systems, rcp calls scp by default which can be irritating when I don’t know whether I had placed mine there yet or not… I learnt this later. > The original problem was it needed to be called for it to be "scp" in > order to meet the job spec. Considering rsync’s vastly differing semantics especially regarding trailing slashes for directories in source, destination and both, I deliberately did not name it scp-alike. (I lost my eMail archives once due to missing a slash, with rcp --delete. No big loss ofc, had backups of anything really important.) bye, //mirabilos -- Infrastrukturexperte • tarent solutions GmbH Am Dickobskreuz 10, D-53121 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ Telephon +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235 HRB AG Bonn 5168 • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg ************************************************* Mit dem tarent-Newsletter nichts mehr verpassen: www.tarent.de/newsletter ************************************************* _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev