On Mon, 2020-08-03 at 19:17 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > That would be the same as killing scp… Better that... than having an inherently insecure scp... or at least make it absolutely clear and rename it to i[nsecure]scp. If the core functionality of a program (which is here probably the "secure") is no longer given, then it's IMO better to rather cause breakage (at least for old clients), than to keep going. Cheers, Chris. _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
