That's why rsync is the better alternative to scp/sftp ... it does uploads and downloads with the same sane syntax, and does recursive, permissions, and doesn't need to upload/download everything again when re-trying :) rscynv -vPar <source> <dest> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:35 PM Stuart Henderson <stu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2019/11/04 14:28, Darren Tucker wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 14:07, David Newall <openssh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > [about scp] That's just awful, and I should have > > > thought it was not at all necessary. Am I missing something? > > > > > > > If you're saying that the scp protocol is an unfixable mess then the > > openssh team has been agreeing[0] with you for at least a decade and a > > half. We fix what we can, but some parts can't be fixed. > > > > [0] eg https://marc.info/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=104157774216425&w=2 > > At various times I've tried to use sftp instead of scp but it never lasted > long. Remembering to type sftp instead of scp isn't so bad, but file > uploads are really hard to work with, I don't think it's possible to get > good finger memory for "echo 'put somefile' | sftp hostname:/tmp/" (and > it's even worse when copying out multiple files). > > I'm sure it's already been considered, but from a user perspective it > would be very convenient if we could have essentially the command-line > interface of scp(1) (with divergence for filename escaping) but using > the SFTP protocol. > > _______________________________________________ > openssh-unix-dev mailing list > openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev > -- Mark Janssen -- mark@xxxxxxxxx Unix / Linux Open-Source and Internet Consultant _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
