Hey everyone, Basically, I'm trying to figure out if I can configure sshd to require that the user has a key that has been signed by a trusted user CA *and* is listed separately as an authorised key (or the user has a signed key and a different authorised key)? The closest I've come is having an `authorized_keys` file have two entries consisting of the CA key and a normal key with `AuthenticationMethods: publickey,publickey` option set, so that sshd requires that a user produces both the normal key and a signed key. This works, but means a user can't then have multiple keys (e.g. one per device), and feels somewhat brittle in that adding a key to that file breaks the requirement that the user presents a signed key. The motivation behind this is that I've been looking at using a self-service cert authority that lets users get their keys signed by the CA in a restricted way, e.g. be IP locked, have expiry times, requires third party approval to get access to certain hosts, etc. However, I'm uncomfortable having a single server have the CA cert, since if the box gets owned they get credentials to access everything. Hence wondering if we could require having both a valid key *and* a valid signature from the CA, as then having the cert by itself is useless. Thoughts and suggestions welcome, including that this sounds like a terrible idea and I'm doing it wrong. Thanks, Erik _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
