On 2019/01/23 14:13, Michael Stone wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:35:13PM -0600, Ben Lindstrom wrote: > > But the only way to drag scp into this century is pretty much a scp2 > > style interface. > > This. The openssh devs have been complaining for almost 20 years that people > should just use sftp, ignoring the fact that command line users hate the > interface. If the first 17 years of telling people that the new interface is > better didn't do it, it's unlikely that they'll be convinced this year. remote->local copies in many common cases work just fine with s/scp/sftp. local->remote not so much - allowing "sftp localfile host:/path/" would go a long way towards making it easier for command line users to switch. _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
