Damien Miller <djm@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> We don't plan to remove this check. Accidental key exposure is still an
> unfortunately common problem and,
Could you please explain where you got this data from? I'd like a reference, please.
> while this check isn't perfect, I'm
> pretty sure that it avoids enough real-world misconfiguration to
> justify it's continued existence.
If this check "while not perfect ... avoids real-world misconfiguration", why is there "accidental key exposure"?
Is there a contradiction?
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
