Frankly, I'd much rather see PKCS#11 support for EC keys integrated.
—
Regards,
Uri
On 9/21/18, 8:58 AM, "openssh-unix-dev on behalf of Damien Miller" <openssh-unix-dev-bounces+uri=ll.mit.edu@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of djm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018, Joseph S. Testa II wrote:
> Hmm... crickets. Does this imply that X448 in OpenSSH is not ever a
> possibility?
I'm not sure what more to I can add.
Like I said: none of us presently see the value of it outweighing the
cost of having to support X448 and SHA3 in ~perpetuity.
-d
_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
