Re: Status of OpenSSL 1.1 support - Thoughts

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

 



Views, technologies, best practices, and threats evolve and change. 

So, regardless of what it is and how it came about, move to, e.g., opaque structures appears inevitable to me. And if LibreSSL hasn't done that yet, most likely it would have to in the long run.

Regards,
Uri

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 18, 2017, at 15:32, Peter Stuge <peter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL wrote:
>> In my opinion, a reasonable thing for OpenSSH to do would be to
>> port their code to using accessor functions, and write a shim
>> library to the “old” way (exactly as was proposed here before).
>> 
>> LibreSSL would have to do the same eventually.
> 
> It seems to be a bug that more than one project needs to do that.
> 
> 
> //Peter
> _______________________________________________
> openssh-unix-dev mailing list
> openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux