Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 support and RSA_set0_key() double frees?

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

 



On 06/14/2017 03:50 PM, Sebastian Krahmer wrote:
Hi

Our openssh maintainer pointed me to these patches:

http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/2016-September/035378.html
http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/2016-November/035454.html

aiming to solve the openssl 1.1. API-change problems.

In particular

https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/openssh.git/tree/openssh-7.3p1-openssl-1.1.0.patch

which seems to be used by fedora, contains code like this:


  +         (r = sshbuf_get_u32(ids, &bits)) != 0 ||
  +         (r = sshbuf_get_bignum1(ids, e)) != 0 ||
  +         (r = sshbuf_get_bignum1(ids, n)) != 0 ||
  +         (RSA_set0_key(key->rsa, n, e, NULL) == 0) ||
  +         (r = sshbuf_get_cstring(ids, &comment, NULL)) != 0) {
  +             BN_free(n);
  +             BN_free(e);
                goto out;
  ...
  out:
          sshkey_free(key);

Note, that the manpage says about RSA_set0_key():

"Calling this function
transfers the memory management of the values to the RSA object, and
therefore the values that have been passed in should not be freed by
the caller after this function has been called."

So, unless theres some tricky ref-counting inside BN_free() and
RSA_free(), that gets called by sshkey_free(), this is a double-free
condition. Since RSA_set0_key() may succeed and sshbuf_get_cstring()
may fail inside the if.

There are various places like this, so the get0/set0 pattern that is
used has to be reviewed.
I am not sure whether the manpage also forbids calling BN_free()
in case of RSA_set0_key() errors.

Please take me in Cc, I am not subscribed.

Sebastian


Hello Sebastian,
thank you for a message. You are right that this could cause some problems. Reading through the code, most of the occurrences are in the SSH1 code which is already gone from upstream.

I tried to fix in Fedora repository. [1] Let me know if it is as you would expected or you found some other issues. If so, patches are welcomed.

[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/openssh.git/commit/?id=f07a0866

Regards,

--
Jakub Jelen
Software Engineer
Security Technologies
Red Hat
_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev



[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux