On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 08:28:59PM +1000, Darren Tucker wrote: > On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 11:40 PM, The Doctor <doctor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > [...] > > Getting back to English, word on USENet is that there is a proposed > > open ssl 1.1 patch. > > > > Can it be implemented? > > > The problems with doing so have been mentioned previously on this list > (tl;dr: lack of forward compatibility between openssl 1.0.x and 1.1.x APIs). > > https://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/2016-November/035456.html > https://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/2016-November/035458.html > The other problem is that openssl 1.0.X will be removed. Only 1.0.2 will remain and that will come to an end. OPenssl 1.0.1 is now dead. Certainly you can do if (openssl is less than 1.1) Code else Code accordingly > -- > Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au) > GPG key 11EAA6FA / A86E 3E07 5B19 5880 E860 37F4 9357 ECEF 11EA A6FA (new) > Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience > usually comes from bad judgement. -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism BC Keep your province Healthy!! Vote Liberal. _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
