Re: proposed change to ssh_connect_direct()

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Peter Moody <mindrot@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> so I spent a bit of time looking at this and it seems like the only
> way to go, at least if I want to keep it in ssh_connect_direct(), is
> to use pthreads. further, it seems like getting that accepted is
> something of a long shot:

Sorry, pthreads is a non-starter.

I would have thought that using non-blocking connect (ie set
O_NONBLOCK on the fds, initiate the connections then select on the set
until one succeeds) would be feasible, though.

> so, approaching this from a different angle, what if I wanted to have
> something else establish the tcp connection and then fork/dup2/exec
> ssh and pass off the fd's for the network connection?

That's how ProxyComand and ProxyUseFdpass work.  Your dialler is a
separate program so it can do whatever you like, including use
pthreads if that's your thing.

-- 
Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au)
GPG key 11EAA6FA / A86E 3E07 5B19 5880 E860  37F4 9357 ECEF 11EA A6FA (new)
    Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience
usually comes from bad judgement.
_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev



[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux