On Tue 2016-11-15 08:02:06 +0900, Damien Miller wrote:
> That's an option that involves a heap of work. I've toyed with it
> for a while now, but haven't been motivated enough to start it. Part
> of the reason is that there has been no compelling alternative open-
> source crypto library to justify the effort of building the abstraction
> layer. I don't really feel like OpenSSL 1.1 is sufficiently different
> to justify it either.
FWIW, i consider nettle to be a compelling FLOSS crypto primitive
library. It doesn't provide TLS or SSL, but i don't think that's
anything that OpenSSH would care about.
https://www.lysator.liu.se/~nisse/nettle/
--dkg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
