On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Alex Bligh <alex@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 15 Jan 2016, at 16:27, Roland Mainz <roland.mainz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Don't these extra roundtrips further increase the latency of ssh >> connection setup (e.g. imagine a high-bandwidth&&high-latency satelite >> link) ? ssh is already a *PAIN* in that area, killing it's usefullness >> for applications like "Distributed make" because the time to setup the >> connection can be much longer than the command executed on the remote >> side. > > They would, but only when this non-default option was enabled. OK... are there any good ideas how to mitigate the latency effect ([1]) ? [1]=Long on my wishlist is something like a SSH3 protocol which somehow can rival Kerberised rsh (yes, yes, I know, it's comparing apples with pears) in connection setup latency and better handles socket/pipe buffer boundaries (sort of |SOCK_SEQPACKET|-style) ... (But this is now going waaaay off-topic from the original subject... so either drop or rename subject of the thread...) ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz@xxxxxxxxxxx \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
