On Tuesday, March 24, 2015, Damien Miller <djm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 24 Mar 2015, Dan Kaminsky wrote: > > > Hmm. Feels a little aggressive for ssh client. Support heartily for > sshd. > > People who need it can build their own, or OS vendors might supply a > non-default v.1 capable client binary themselves. > > IMO it's time to apply some selection pressure to a protocol that can't > be secured. > > -d > I'm getting some numbers, standby _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
