On Apr 6, 2018 2:23 PM, "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote: >On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 11:54 -0500, Daniel Lenski wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Luis l <chelapa at hotmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi Guys, I am using the latests version of OC w/ Palo Alto VPN ? >> >> As explained on the page for the fork with PAN GlobalProtect support >> (https://github.com/dlenski/openconnect#feedback-and-troubleshooting), >> you should report problems which are specific to PAN-GP as a new issue >> on Github, rather than on this mailing list. GlobalProtect support is >> not yet part of the official OpenConnect. > > FWIW I have no objection to using the mailing list for it even when it > isn't merged yet. Great, okay! I think I added that admonition on the Github project README when it was at a much less functional state. > Where *are* we with merging it? I gave you another round of cleaned-up-and-rebased patches on March 4, and one more patch on top on March 27 (for tolerance of oversize ESP packets, in the same vein as previous patches for tolerating oversize ONCP and GPST packets). > I did some heckling > at the last round of patches as there was some string allocation > confusion, and it looked like it hadn't been run in valgrind. Did you > give me another set after that? valgrind credibly accuses me of a lengthy of memory-allocation crimes. I haven't fixed them all yet. :-( Do you have a preferred invocation for valgrind'ing openconnect, by the way? To test the GP protocol, I've been using variants of this: valgrind --tool=memcheck --leak-check=full --log-file=/tmp/valgrind.log -v $OPENCONNECT_BIN --protocol=globalprotect -u $USERNAME --csd-wrapper ./hipreport.sh $SERVER Thanks, Dan
