[PATCH] Fix build on DragonFly BSD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2017-07-08 at 09:12 +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> 
> Thank you,
> ?Certainly interesting to add, though unless you contribute some
> system we can do CI with it, it will be an unsupported variant (due to
> budget constraints I even removed the freebsd CI).
> 
> Now to the details. Your patch didn't have the signoff tag, nor I
> could apply it with git am (see [0]).
> Could you open a merge request or re-send your patch correctly?

Hi Nikos,

Sorry for my wrongly formatted patch.  I have reformatted my patch and
opened a merge request on the GitLab [1].  Please take a look.

On the other hand, I have a DragonFly BSD box available, which can be
configured as a CI box.  Could you provide me with doc/guides on CI
setup?  I can try it out when I have some time.  Thank you.

[1] https://gitlab.com/ocserv/ocserv/merge_requests/48


Regards,
-- 
Aly
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openconnect-devel/attachments/20170708/6f5363a2/attachment.sig>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux