On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 08:29 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > Yes. I basically quoted the whole of his message, so you're not really > missing much context. The openconnect-devel message is here, if you > want it: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openconnect-devel/2016-May/003652.html OK, yeah I found that before, but I couldn't find any earlier messages in the apparent thread to understand the context better. ?No matter, you've explained it well enough here, thanks :) > The latter part of the paragraph is actually talking about something > different. Juniper / Junos Pulse is transitioning from the old "Network > Connect" protocol, to the new "Junos Pulse" protocol. Both of which I > might be using non-official names for. OK, I think I understand. I'll still volunteer to help in an capacity I can. ?I think the gateway I connect to using "openconnect --juniper", or with the proprietary "ncsvc" client, supports the newer juniper/pulse protocols as well, because I know that windows users connect to the same gateway with a "pulse" client. So I may be able to help in that regard as well. ?I'm certainly willing to try, in any case, but will need a bit of guidance from someone more familiar with the innards. -- Brett Johnson<brett at hpe.com> "UNIX is easy to use. UNIX is not necessarily easy to learn. Learn the difference." ~~ Alexander Koch
